I am not living in a bubble: I'm very aware that my son may have sex before he moves out.
That said, while I will make sure he does have access to condoms, he won't be having sex in our house. If you aren't resourceful enough to find a place and some privacy on your own, you aren't resourceful enough to support a child. To me, allowing children to have sex in their parent's home is very confusing... are these parents planning on grandparenting in their own home too? It sends a mixed message: we want you to be safe doing this thing you want to do, but we won't want to deal with the very likely and realistic consequence of intercourse, which is pregnancy.
The mother in the article who stated: ""With kids having sex at home, it's a safer environment, because you know it's clean," Skudlarek said. "They have condoms in their bedroom. And it's an environment they're familiar with, as opposed to a motel or a car."... I want to ask her, are you parenting or running a brothel? Why are you so concerned about your child being 'comfortable' having sex?
When I was 18 and still living at home, if I wanted to spend the night with a boyfriend, I did have to go to a hotel. Not under mom's room. The cost alone made me think twice if it was 'worth it'. Half my paycheck for one night with a guy who couldn't even be bothered to chip in? Having to come up with my own options made me have to think about the realities of the situation...
Lastly, I agreed so much with having this rule to give kids an 'out' if need be. I think it sends a clear message to both kids involved that sex is an adult activity, for people who are behaving like adults and that we value our child. When parents make clear boundaries for both their child and their boyfriend or girlfriend, it puts the boy/girlfriend on notice that the parents care and that we don't take their dating lightly. We will encourage our son to very much consider all of the other opportunities and great things he has to look forward to...having sex is only one of them.