My story isn't really warm and fuzzy. My oldest son is about to turn 19, and he was born after a pretty uneventful delivery, no drugs, and a bit more than two hours of pushing. Just as he was delivered, the doctor brought him up and started to move to put the baby on my abdomen and I just wanted no parts of it. I didn't yell or say no, I just turned my head away and kept my hands at my side. I think the doctor realized I did not want to hold my baby immediately, so sort of in mid motion, he reversed and gave the baby to the nurse. Our son was weighed, measured, cleaned and wrapped up right next to me, and I watched, but I wasn't gushing or cooing or anything like that. My husband held him before I did, and the look on my husband's face was precious. I remember thinking, "Wow! You feel like that right away?" We had been expecting a girl, but had a son. (Ultrasounds were not so detailed 20 years ago!) And my husband was beaming and was nearly speechless. The doctor asked, "What's his name?" and my husband blurted out, "Charles Patrick IV". Now, to this day, I hate, hate, hate that name! But the look on my husband's face was unlike anything I had ever seen. I couldn't bring myself to disagree with the name. (But, later I did insist that we call our son Patrick rather than add him to the pile of Chucks, Charlies and Chas in the family.)
Well, later when we were alone with our son, I held him and looked at him, nursed him and I certainly knew and felt that he was my baby, and I loved him. But I was disappointed because I never had the moment of overpowering love at first sight that I had heard and read about. I did love him and I was very, very happy to have him. But I think I was expecting something unbelievable, maybe a lightning bolt of love.
And I was deeply embarrassed by that. I felt that there was something wrong with me, especially as my friends talked about that big moment of new love, and all the parenting books talked about it... Bond! Hold your baby immediately! Nurse immediately! It's unbelievable!
Well, that didn't happen to me. I didn't feel depressed or even blue. I was very happy to have my beautiful little boy, and I loved him. I just did not want to hold him immediately and I did not feel a big rush of emotion at all.
In those days, Dr. Berry Brazelton had a show on t.v. and I watched it all the time. One day he did a program about bonding, and in that program he talked about studies he had done years and years before in places we'd call "primitive". I can't remember the specific cultures he mentioned, but he talked about how first-time mothers often did not hold their children immediately. It was the practice to take first born children a short distance from the mother and allow other people in the family and community to hold the child. He said that often the mothers actually turned their backs away from the baby and sometimes fell immediately to sleep. There was no immediate holding or nursing by the new mother. He said, without fail, within an hour or two, the mother would ask for her child, and then at her pace, which could take several weeks, she would then bond with her child. And during all this time, she had a lot of help to care for her and her baby.
I was amazed when I heard this! That's exactly what I had felt like when by child was born! I just wanted to turn away for a time and sleep, rest and recover. Yet, everyone was telling me that I HAD to feel that rush, that it was normal to just be overpowered by emotion, to want to reach out and hold my child, to nurse him and gaze at him. I had a much more matter-of-fact feeling toward my child. It was more like, "I'm a mom now. I will take care of you."
So, I never held my baby immediately, and it was 2 hours before I nursed him. It in no way has damaged our bond. Patrick and I have always been close. He's 19 and we talk together and joke and go out to eat together. I've never gone through any of the teenage rebellion with him that so many other parents have to live through. He's always very respectful of me and every other human being. He's kind, gentle and loving. No one would ever guess that I "rejected" him when he was born.
My point in telling this story is that bonding has a full range of normal. When I finally discovered that the way I felt was not only normal, but also the norm in various other cultures, I began talking about it. I discovered that many other first-time moms felt the same way that I did. They felt obligated to have that big wow moment with angels singing in the background. They held their babies and nursed and actually pretended to feel that love. And indeed, many mothers do experience that overpowering feeling. But it's also normal to have less dramatic moments, or to even outright reject a child, especially a first-born child, for a time. When you write your story, I'd ask that you do some research and write a balanced story. For years and years most parenting literature has talked about how important it is to have skin-to-skin contact, to nurse the child, etc., just as one other poster has talked about. I don't think we need another story that tells us that Americans give birth the "wrong" way. The fact of the matter is, the idea that bonding MUST happen immediately can also be wrong for some mothers. I did not want to hold my son in the first few moments that he was born. I didn't want to touch him at all. I went through a lot of anxiety about that until I saw that television show. I thought I was an awful mother. I finally confessed to my grandmother, who was in her 80's at the time. In the 1930's my grandmother gave birth to four children at home with a midwife and my grandfather in attendance. She said she felt exactly the same way when her first child was born. She was a immigrant and was attended by the immigrant community and followed the customs of the "old country" when giving birth. It turns out that, just as the Dr. Brazelton reported, my grandmother did not hold her first-born child immediately. She simply was allowed to rest and recover, and when she asked for her child, the baby was brought to her.
This works both ways. If we take a child away from a mother immediately when she wants the child, that's not right. But it's also not right to force a baby upon a mother just because everyone else thinks it should be done. Bonding occurs immediately or over time. The bond between parent and child goes on forever, goes through peaks and troughs through all their stages of development, and that's completely normal. There's no one right way to bond with a child. In fact, many adoptive and foster parents never have the opportunity to bond with a child at birth, yet they can have very strong, loving, bonded relationships with their children. There's no magic formula that works for everyone.
Please don't write yet another story talking about those powerful moments of love at first sight. We've all heard those stories for years. The message that many moms hear is that we're SUPPOSED to feel that way. We're supposed to feel all sorts of ways, in fact. There are plenty of mothers who have stories like mine, and they don't talk about it. They are afraid to be judged negatively, so no one ever hears that it's normal not to want your newborn plopped on your stomach.
Oh! And I don't want to forget this ... A less dramatic moment of first-bonding is not necessarily equal to postpartum depression. It's just that the range of normal is wide. I also heard that. "If you didn't want to hold your child, you must have had postpartum depression." That's just not always the truth. Mothers are judged and criticized enough without having to feel badly about how they react the first seconds after their children are born.
And by the way... when my second child was born, I had that big dramatic moment of immediate, overwhelming love. (And *I* chose his name! NOT my husband :)