I kind of think that international adoption is a form of human trafficking. I hear that U.S. families gravitate towards adopting internationally because it is much easier than the process of a domestic one. With that said, wouldn't one wonder WHY it is easier? Or who oversees the process? When dealing with another country, it is much easier to be scammed or contribute to something you never would if you knew all the details. I am taking an ethics/law in world business class right now, and some of the world trade practices are horrible. In some countries, dead bodies with their organs harvested are being found abandoned in the street, for consumers in our country for organ transplants. Now, I am not saying that the U.S. consumer knew about that, but it made me think of the adoption issue at hand. While the consumer doesn't know...there are many third, fourth and fifth parties at play in these exchanges. You cannot be sure of who you are dealing with. For all you know, these children are stolen from their families or are being sold from the black market.
Now, I am not exactly a fan of the U.S. adoption process either. In fact, when I was pregnant, I came very close to giving up my daughter for adoption. I met with several reputable agencies, and I will tell you...it is a money machine over here as well. I was told to stay on state aid for my prenatal care, while the families who wanted to adopt were also being charged for my prenatal care. There were many other red flags too, that are not in the interest of the bio mom or adoptive family. Apparently newborns are a hot commodity for agencies.
I am not against the entire adoption concept......just against most of the industry that it is now. I don't think one should be able to have a business license to run an adoption agency as a business between private parties like it is now. I think that it is a responsibility that should be kept at a federal and state level, as with foster children.
What is interesting is that all the reasons you mention as to why you want to adopt can be addressed here as well. Our country has children in poverty too. You would be surprised to look up in your town how many infants are uncared for in orphanages. Children that are right there...waiting for a better opportunity too. For me, location does seem to be an issue, because you would turn your back on the children in your own community.
Good luck with whatever you do, and try to do as much research as possible.
UPDATE: Did a little research on the credibility of Holt...thought this perspective on basic human rights was very interesting:
http://holtsurvivor.wordpress.com/2008/11/
I liked how this passage put it in one of the blogs on this site as well...http://holtsurvivor.wordpress.com/2008/09/
"Holt started operations by taking advantage of a humanitarian crisis. Yet long after the crisis was over, they continued to perpetuate their operations by creating a demand for international babies. Long after Korea had become a first world nation, they continue to encourage and promote a market for babies there.
Without this market, Korea would be forced to improve their social services and bring their backwards cultural stigmas forward into the twentieth century, to match their first world status and because they can now afford social programs. It is Holt’s easy presense and the market for babies which provide an easy way out for the government and its citizens. Holt needs to get out of Korea once and for all and let Korea take care of its own."
And in response to Sandy L...YES, I have been doing my research, and YES my eyes are WIDE open, unfettered by the burning desire to have another newborn in my family. I am researching this unbiased, and am not liking what I find:( But I did appreciate your post, you did have some really good points until you started calling other posters ignorant;)