We have four kids. Our first two are only 14 months, and 4 days apart. Our second two, are twins, who are 3 years and 5 days apart from the middle child. My twins are WAY easier than having the two 14 months apart. With them so close, I've found that they go in a piggy back style, through stages. So when one is leaving the terrible twos, the other is just starting. I love how close they are though. (they are both boys!) And how much they have in common now. Right now, we don't really have a middle child, it worked out nice for us, with two and two.
Anyway! What I was going to say, is that after having the two fourteen months apart, it sure was nice to have the three year break in between. It made a WORLD of difference in my pregnancy, to not be carrying a baby, and then chasing a toddler right after delivering!!!
So, for us, it worked out well, but I would really reccomend, if you have two close together(like it sounds like your 2nd and 3rd will be) that there be a few years in between. Not only to let your body recover from two pregnancies close togehter. But also, when your kids are a little older (as I'm sure you see with your 5 year old right now) they can enjoy your pregnancies with you!!
Good luck with the rest of your pregnancy, and with your decision on when to have more!!!
J.
Mom to
Dallas (5-4-01)
Gabriel (7-8-02)
Kaleb and Kendyl (7-13-05 b/g twins)