You say he refused a dna test, does that mean he accepted paternity and did not want the dna test to prove it? or that he was denying paternity? I ask because when me and my ex split and we went for child support they offered it, he accepted paternity and refused the dna test. They told him that if he refused, down the road it would not matter since he was conceding that he was the father. Although he refusted the sign the birth certificate, is he listed anyway? These two refusals (lack of test or being listed) means that at this time, as far as the court is concerned, he is not the father (and the father would be assumed unknown). Obviously, a dna test could prove he is the father even if you don't admit to it.
I would not worry until the papers are actually filed. With him not being the legal father, until it goes to court, you will retain custody for sure. After court, he could end up with visitation but you can push for supervised (at least for a time to your son used to and comfortable with him) especially with his legal history.
Sounds like he's just trying to bully you. If he's not been involved to this point, what prompted his sudden desire to "take your son away"?
BTW, child support and visitation are two different things. In this case, he would have to establish paternity and in turn they would likely order support and medical coverage. I hear MD can be tough on dead beat parents...I have relatives that live there and they told me that if a woman goes to court and claims a guy is the father, if they "maybe the father" they are ordered to pay support until they prove they aren't because so many guys would refuse dna tests to avoid support orders.
Updated
You say he refused a dna test, does that mean he accepted paternity and did not want the dna test to prove it? or that he was denying paternity? I ask because when me and my ex split and we went for child support they offered it, he accepted paternity and refused the dna test. They told him that if he refused, down the road it would not matter since he was conceding that he was the father. Although he refusted the sign the birth certificate, is he listed anyway? These two refusals (lack of test or being listed) means that at this time, as far as the court is concerned, he is not the father (and the father would be assumed unknown). Obviously, a dna test could prove he is the father even if you don't admit to it.
I would not worry until the papers are actually filed. With him not being the legal father, until it goes to court, you will retain custody for sure. After court, he could end up with visitation but you can push for supervised (at least for a time to your son used to and comfortable with him) especially with his legal history.
Sounds like he's just trying to bully you. If he's not been involved to this point, what prompted his sudden desire to "take your son away"?
BTW, child support and visitation are two different things. In this case, he would have to establish paternity and in turn they would likely order support and medical coverage. I hear MD can be tough on dead beat parents...I have relatives that live there and they told me that if a woman goes to court and claims a guy is the father, if they "maybe the father" they are ordered to pay support until they prove they aren't because so many guys would refuse dna tests to avoid support orders.