As you can see, there are many ideas people have for teaching methods. It would be wise to do your homework and use a clinically proven method, rather than shoot in the dark. Reading programs based on Orton/ Gillingham are the best choices. There are a few popular programs available today which always come up in suggestions, some are good, and some leave the child ill equipped.
I am a tutor as well as homeschool mom and I took teaching seminars with a popular California curriculum called SPELL TO WRITE AND READ (SWR). It has a companion program called CURSIVE FIRST.(CF).
I have also been exposed to 'Handwriting Without Tears', and used 'Teach your Child to Read in 100 Easy Lessons.' Both of these have issues. First off, both of these programs were initially developed for use with special needs kids who had learning or motor disabilities. If you have a child with a reasonable intelligence and good motor movement there is no reason to use a program below their ability. Use a program that will match or even slightly challenge their skill level so they can grow.
Handwriting without Tears, simply put, gives the child a box and wants them to place the ball and stick letter in the parameters of the box. I had a mom who brought it with her kids that I was babysitting and had them do it while at my house. My observation was that the children did not spend a great deal of time in perfecting the letters.
Cursive First has the child learn to write, not in a 2 inch box, but on lined paper. This is a more natural format, they way they have been teaching for hundreds of years. First he will learn to do certain shapes in sand with his finger. Then you will teach correct pencil grip and posture, foot placement, arm placement on the table, and even the placement of the other hand and the angle of the paper. Nothing has been left to guesswork and is all outlined in the curriculum. A regular size pencil is the size to use, NEVER a large crayon or marker. You cannot form precise small movements with these large implements, and all children will revert to holding them with a fist grip because you cannot get a comfortable pencil grip hold on them. Just try as an adult to write a letter to a freind with them using a pencil grip! They are useless for writing. Pencils are tools, and they were built with the perfect demensions in mind for that purpose. Not the big fat pencils, but the standard size pencil which sits naturally in the hand in a pencil grip. When the child is in preschool and drawing, these big crayons /pens are fine. When the child is to sit down and be formally tutored in forming letters, about 6-7 yrs old, these should never be used. With Cursive First your child learns the strokes through repetition and practice, not copying inside a box. He uses his mind to train his hand how they are formed, always starting at the baseline and USING THE BASELINE and the dotted line as a gauge to form the letter. Some letters will go below the baseline or meet at the baseline, some, like an h, will go up above the dotted line. These need to be taught and that concept is lost in a program that simply desires you to fit the letter in a box. When the child moves on to write on paper, he will have nothing to use as a means to guide him. He will no doubt want to write ball and stick. By the time my kids were in 4th grade, they had to write paragraphs. Cursive is much faster to form than manuscript and writing was easier. Ball and stick makes you lift your pencil up off the paperand restart. Cursive does not. Also, because my two children learned cursive first, they were ahead of the game. Instead of spending hours now learning cursive in 3rd grade, they already knew it and were using that time on other subjects.
There are 4 or 5 basic strokes in cursive and once the child knows those basics he can form any letter. Cursive writing actually has less strokes than manuscript. In addition, this program has flash cards. It will tell you exactly what letter to start with( which would be the easiest one to form), then moving to the most difficult ones after, with capitals at the end. If you use SWR at the same time, the letter sounds can be taught concurrent with the letter formation.
I taught my first child to read and write with a different curriculum (and I taught manuscript/capitals first since that is what the public schools taught and they must know best, right?). After several years of teaching and learning the SWR program, I used SWR with the Cursive First to teach my second and third child.
I did see a dramatic difference in the outcome. The child who was taught manuscript first still tends to revert back to manuscript, and to place manuscript letters in with her cursive. She also puts in capitals where they need not be. Her writing tends to be messy.
The children who were taught cursive first have beautiful penmanship and automatically write in cursive. There is no injection of manuscript in their writing. It is known through research that whatever your brain learns first will be what you want to revert back to.
I taught my first child to read with "Teach Your Kids to Read in 100 Easy Lessons". I did not know about the origins of the program or the author when I chose it. Like many new moms, I was not confident in my teaching ability at the time and wanted something 'easy'. This program teaches the child to ignore silent letters, and just pretend they wern't there, rather than teach the reason as to WHY we have silent letters and how those silent letters canchange the sound of other letters in the word. For example , we have silent E for 5 different reasons. Once you know those reasons, you can not only learn to read the word, but you will know how to spell the word as well. There are several phonograms (letter/vowel combinations) that are missing in this book. (and no spelling rules at all.) When you get to the end of it, he says you should go out and finish learning them somewhere else. What? How do you teach someone to partially read and then say go find the rest of the info somewhere else. That is because his method has holes. It doesnt follow spelling rules or proven reading methods. Upon my research I learned the author did not have formal training in tutoring/teaching special ed methods when he wrote this book. I hate to say it but I have then seen his method being used in many public schools, and not on only special ed kids but across the board. Is there any wonder why our kids today are having to go to outside tutoring classes in record numbers? Thirty years ago we didn't have tutoring shops on every corner. Because the schools had not fully turned themselves over to embracing these special ed teaching methods. 100 years ago cursive was taught first in public schools. 100 years ago a 6th grader had the educational level of a high school graduate / entry college level student of today.
SWR teaches the child to read recognizig the sounds of the consonants with one sound first, then the consonants with two sounds (s can say s or z, ...c can say K or S....and finally it moves on to vowels , which can have up to 3 sounds ( A says.. a, A, ah) and finally moving to phonograms..starting with simple sounds like ee, oo....moving to the ones with 4 sounds or 4 letters, last. It has flash cards with no fancy pictures which distract, just the shape of the letter which is shown in a lower case book style. (the same font you would see if you were reading a book). Each card is scripted on the back so the teacher knows exactly what to say, and repeats the same verbiage every time, enforcing the concept. It also has a set of spelling rule flash cards, also scripted on the back. There is a book that goes with it that tells you at what point in the program to start teaching which spelling rule, which phongram, etc....
When a young child , preschool age, is desiring to form letters, it is ok to teach them how to write their name in lowercase manuscript. But once formal teaching is needed (and the brain is ready, about 6 yrs old average, maybe a little older for boys) I recommend a method with prooven success.