I have been investigating vitamins for years and recently my focus was on vitamin D.
What I find out is alarming and the information is generally kept from being made 'well known' to the public, but anyone can find it by extensive digging on the internet. Even most doctors don't know the clinical trials or the history of vit D.
Early vit D trials we done on institutionalized people- people in mental hospitals who never even saw the light of day. Eventually more trials were done on elderly, convalecent home patients. The original recommendations from the few trials done ,was to add vit D to those patients who did not get any adequate sunlight. The Executive director/founder of the vit D council, John Cornell, was a college dropout SOCIALIST ACTIVIST. If you have studied these reptiles at all then this alone should alarm you. His organization, the vit D council, ran on grants from Kettering, an organization who's hands were VERY involved in giving thier largest grants to companies who did gene therapy and cloning. (Think selective breeding and population control / DE-population.) Keterring was also very involved in Dartmouth- who held councils TO SWAY PUBLIC OPINION in a particular direction for thier own purposes. The "reality" of the (false) need to add vit D to foods and for people to take it in supplements came out of these think tanks. Papers are circulated, books are published , opinions are influenced then cemented in people's minds, and before you know it , it has become 'truth'.
Here are some quotes from the government themselves, (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov and usda.gov) showing that vit D was never 'meant' for everyday usage, that it was never studied enough, and they really dont know the long term outcome on health:
" Unlike anything else in the fortification of food, the purpose for vit D added to food is to correct for environmental defect (no sun exposure) and NOT for nutritional deficiency. NO FOOD normally consumed by man has naturally occuring vit D in it."
"the exact physiological function on 1,25OHD2 (vit D) on the brain, pancreas, lymphocites and skin remains unknown"
" the sun corrects vit d deficiency"
" babies do not require supplemental vit D"
" an average intake suggestion (RDA) of vit D are based on people with limited to no exposure to sun and limited stores of vit D."
" it's difficult to determine refrence values for people 18-50, more studies are needed" (they are saying this because they have based their studies on the elderly, sickly and frail.)
"Vit D is stored in fat in winter"
" Humans of all ages, races, and sex can get all of their vit D through adequate sun exposure"
Now why is vit D supplements worrysome?...
Just 8 minutes of sun will give you a very high dose of vit D, all you need really. Extra vit D leads to disease. Look up hypervitaminosis D.
Natural vit D is metabolized in the kidney and excess is stored. Synthetic chemical vit D circulates in the body for three days to three weeks, and works with the parathyroid hormone to cause stimulation of calcium and phosphorus (bone reabsorption). .
D supplements caused hypercalcemia in many clinical trials, where calcium is from bone is re deposited in soft tissues and organs. Jeans and Sterns 1938 report found hypercalcemia and retarded growth in 35 infants who received 1800-45000 IU a day. After the vit D supps were stopped, hypercalcemia declined.
There is really no way to know how much total vit D you are actually receiving, from the sun/ food. Therefore, there is no way to know if you are going above the recommended limit (remember- for those who never get any sun). Only 200 IU is recommended for those who never see sun. that's about the amount in 2 C of milk if I am calculating right. Then add any other added vit D to food.( irradiated nuts, produce and lunchmeat has been shown to have vit D from the radiation). Prof Holick of Boston Univ says 10,000-25,000 IU's are recieved from just a brief noonday sun exposure. Then add any vit D stored in your fat. Sometimes vit D is added to shampoo and lotions. So as you can see , you get plenty of vit D. Actually enough to cause disease.
People who have Low serum vit D (which is usually caused by disregulation of vit d from bacteria) can increase serum levels by taking magnesium.
As far as doctors wanting to feed her formula, the only thing I can think is that formula is high in Iron. Well, that might help if your child has anemia causing the jaundice, but that doesnt help if it is any other reason!
Hemolytic Jaundice occurs in a process "before the liver"..toxin,infection, immune disorders.
Parenchymal Jaundice occurs "in the liver" ...liver flukes, bacterial or hep B infection, enzyme coverting deficiency, and
obstructive jaundice is after the liver blocked ducts, malformed ducts, etc
Conjestive heart failure can be a cause. but probably more common are these two causes:
Hemochromatosis- in a nutshell the child is getting poisoned by too much iron. More common now because docs ask moms to take it AND put their babies on it. (that is why it is important for the doctor to know WHY the jaundice is occuring- before loading on Iron supps or formula.
The Vit K shot on the heel after birth can cause G6pd-an enzyme deficiency.
I wouldnt take any supps like calcium, vit D, iron, folic acid, or phosphorus (most of these are in most multi vits.) Vitamins and minerals play off eachother like a fine instrument. God put them in PERFECT harmony in foods..taking synthetic can cause dysregulation of chemical balance as the amounts or complimetary minerals are out of balance. Mangesium is one of the few minerals I think is helpful because it is NOT put into foods and multivitamins in any decent amount. what is funny is, it is the more imortant one we SHOULD have a good amount of.