J.A.
Hi K.,
You're not missing anything. Children under a certain height and weight (I think it is 5 feet and 100 pounds) should ride in the back because of the air bags. Under that size and the air bag deployment in an accident could actually injure them severely.
I think the back seat is just safer anyway. (statistics prove it) I do realize some parents do not always follow this rule. Perhaps they do not know; or perhaps they have an air bag they can switch off or no air bag at all. Often times I think they simple do not have enough seats in the rear and they have put the largest child in front with the seat as far back as it can go. But, you are correct, small children should be in the back seat usually with a car seat or booster seat.
I guess we all have occasion when the ideal is not met, but I would like to think it is not the routine. What bothers me most is the double standard by which the cities and towns and states live. Everyone knows that seatbelts save lives, yet routinely very small children are transported to and from school as well as field trips unsecured, over excited, and with minimal supervision. The powers that be will try to convince you it is because it would be difficult to evacuate the bus in event of a fire. The real truth is if there are seat belts it would slow down pick-ups and drop-offs as well as pose a liability to the city or town because if there were seat belts and they were not in use and a child became injured the city or town would be open to litigation.
Bottom line for me, if seat belts are statistically that much safer why are we concerned about what our neighbors are doing and not asking more questions when put our own children on the school bus each day. We are more independant thinking then just lambs being led to the slaughter aren't we? Let's think more about what we do and not just follow some arbitrary rule. Calculated risks are taken every single day and not just by the people down the street.
J. L.
J. L.